<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Republican Contract on America Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/</link>
	<description>News, Politics, And Opinion From Around The Globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 17:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>(11) Wee wil knot misunderestimate the economony thing

(12) Wee wil restor cowuption too the Wor street

(13) Wee wil encorige lobbing off  Re-publstican semators

(14) Wee wil yous FAUX noows too bwain clean the publsic

(15) Wee wil blaim Bawack Osama fore or oww probleems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(11) Wee wil knot misunderestimate the economony thing</p>
<p>(12) Wee wil restor cowuption too the Wor street</p>
<p>(13) Wee wil encorige lobbing off  Re-publstican semators</p>
<p>(14) Wee wil yous FAUX noows too bwain clean the publsic</p>
<p>(15) Wee wil blaim Bawack Osama fore or oww probleems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Nordstrom</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2292</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Nordstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2292</guid>
		<description>Without a doubt, the single party system (republicrats) have gutted what was once a strong nation. It&#039;s the Constitution Stupid! I recommend funding http://retakecongress.com 

TSgt Eric Nordstrom
McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without a doubt, the single party system (republicrats) have gutted what was once a strong nation. It&#8217;s the Constitution Stupid! I recommend funding http://retakecongress.com </p>
<p>TSgt Eric Nordstrom<br />
McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revo</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Revo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>You notice the word &#039;Right&#039; to keep and bear arms is not substituted to say the &#039;Privilege&#039; to keep and bear arms? A license is a privilege and as well all know privileges can be taken away, rights cannot, rights can only be infringe upon.

Scissors, microwaves, ovens, kitchen knives, bats, golf clubs etc... Can be potentially lethal therefore should we also register them? By sensible people, do you mean ignoramuses who can&#039;t distinguish a Right from a Privilege?  

DRIVING is a privilege in commercial use, TRAVELING on your property for pleasure or transporting your property in a non-commercial way is a Right! 

********
Case # 1 - &quot;Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. - Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22
(&quot;Regulated&quot; here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission i.e.- licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc.)

Case # 2 - &quot;The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by CAR(riage) or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.&quot;- Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579.

It could not be stated more conclusively that Citizens of the states have a right to travel, without approval or restriction, (license,) and that this right is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Here are other court
decisions that expound the same facts:

Case # 3 - &quot;The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the 5th Amendment.&quot; - Kent v Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.

Case # 4 - &quot;Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal Liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the
territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution.&quot; - Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You notice the word &#8216;Right&#8217; to keep and bear arms is not substituted to say the &#8216;Privilege&#8217; to keep and bear arms? A license is a privilege and as well all know privileges can be taken away, rights cannot, rights can only be infringe upon.</p>
<p>Scissors, microwaves, ovens, kitchen knives, bats, golf clubs etc&#8230; Can be potentially lethal therefore should we also register them? By sensible people, do you mean ignoramuses who can&#8217;t distinguish a Right from a Privilege?  </p>
<p>DRIVING is a privilege in commercial use, TRAVELING on your property for pleasure or transporting your property in a non-commercial way is a Right! </p>
<p>********<br />
Case # 1 &#8211; &#8220;Even the legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. &#8211; Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22<br />
(&#8220;Regulated&#8221; here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission i.e.- licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc.)</p>
<p>Case # 2 &#8211; &#8220;The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by CAR(riage) or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.&#8221;- Thompson v Smith 154 SE 579.</p>
<p>It could not be stated more conclusively that Citizens of the states have a right to travel, without approval or restriction, (license,) and that this right is protected under the U.S. Constitution. Here are other court<br />
decisions that expound the same facts:</p>
<p>Case # 3 &#8211; &#8220;The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the 5th Amendment.&#8221; &#8211; Kent v Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.</p>
<p>Case # 4 &#8211; &#8220;Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal Liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the<br />
territory of any State is a right secured by the l4th Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution.&#8221; &#8211; Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJD</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>SJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>At leat there&#039;s no question that it was &quot;ignorance&quot;, as opposed to &quot;partisanship&quot;, that led you to post your totally pointless comment-- which added nothing to the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At leat there&#8217;s no question that it was &#8220;ignorance&#8221;, as opposed to &#8220;partisanship&#8221;, that led you to post your totally pointless comment&#8211; which added nothing to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert chapman</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>robert chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>The ten points of the GOP purity test will be easy for the Dems to refute.

Nine and ten are topical and easy to refute.

(9) Protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; 

Current law denying coverage for pre-existing conditions, setting ceilings on annual and life-time health care benefits, restricting drug prescriptions to company formularies are all medical rationing.  These measures and the pricing of 43 million Americans out of health care coverage would be stopped under President Obama&#039;s reforms of American Health Insurance.  The House of Representatives, the more liberal chamber passed Health Care Reform with a well-publicized provision forbidding federally funded abortions.  Only one Republican supported the amendment when it came for a vote. 

and
(10) The right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership

Cars are potentially lethal, therefore they are registered and operators must be licensed.  Sensible people support the same for guns.

By running on this purity test the GOP will drive away independents.

2010 is beginning to shape well for the Dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ten points of the GOP purity test will be easy for the Dems to refute.</p>
<p>Nine and ten are topical and easy to refute.</p>
<p>(9) Protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; </p>
<p>Current law denying coverage for pre-existing conditions, setting ceilings on annual and life-time health care benefits, restricting drug prescriptions to company formularies are all medical rationing.  These measures and the pricing of 43 million Americans out of health care coverage would be stopped under President Obama&#8217;s reforms of American Health Insurance.  The House of Representatives, the more liberal chamber passed Health Care Reform with a well-publicized provision forbidding federally funded abortions.  Only one Republican supported the amendment when it came for a vote. </p>
<p>and<br />
(10) The right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership</p>
<p>Cars are potentially lethal, therefore they are registered and operators must be licensed.  Sensible people support the same for guns.</p>
<p>By running on this purity test the GOP will drive away independents.</p>
<p>2010 is beginning to shape well for the Dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>I always love when Republicans claim they are anti-abortion.  Check the facts.  Republicans have been throwing this around as an issue for as long as I can remember, but nothing ever changes.  Fact: Roe v Wade was decided under a Republican President with a Republican controlled Supreme Court (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&amp;address=104x5279852).  I realize that link is for a Democratically biased website, but the facts are still solid.  Research it for yourself.  Don&#039;t let anyone tell you how to think!

Republicans don&#039;t want to overturn Roe v Wade, as it would undermine their &quot;doom and gloom&quot; political rally cry.  I call it the &quot;Chicken Little&quot; approach to politics.  According to Republicans, Obama is responsible for every bad thing that happens to our country (&quot;the sky is falling!!&quot;).  The problem is that it means they will not acknowledge any successes that Obama orchestrates.  And, yes, Democrats do the same Chicken Little politics when a Republican is in office.

As an AMERICAN I support the President (whether I voted for him/her or not) - even if the election is questionable (remember 2000?).  I don&#039;t always agree with the decisions made, but that is why our country is not a dictatorship.  I always hope and pray that they succeed!  This can mean that I am praying that I am wrong when I disagree with a decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always love when Republicans claim they are anti-abortion.  Check the facts.  Republicans have been throwing this around as an issue for as long as I can remember, but nothing ever changes.  Fact: Roe v Wade was decided under a Republican President with a Republican controlled Supreme Court (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&#038;address=104&#215;5279852).  I realize that link is for a Democratically biased website, but the facts are still solid.  Research it for yourself.  Don&#8217;t let anyone tell you how to think!</p>
<p>Republicans don&#8217;t want to overturn Roe v Wade, as it would undermine their &#8220;doom and gloom&#8221; political rally cry.  I call it the &#8220;Chicken Little&#8221; approach to politics.  According to Republicans, Obama is responsible for every bad thing that happens to our country (&#8220;the sky is falling!!&#8221;).  The problem is that it means they will not acknowledge any successes that Obama orchestrates.  And, yes, Democrats do the same Chicken Little politics when a Republican is in office.</p>
<p>As an AMERICAN I support the President (whether I voted for him/her or not) &#8211; even if the election is questionable (remember 2000?).  I don&#8217;t always agree with the decisions made, but that is why our country is not a dictatorship.  I always hope and pray that they succeed!  This can mean that I am praying that I am wrong when I disagree with a decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisevil</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>I guess they campaign like libertarians but they spend way more than Democrats and won&#039;t raise a dime to pay for anything so when the Democrats get the presidency they can&#039;t afford to fix anything because of the insane debt and effed up economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they campaign like libertarians but they spend way more than Democrats and won&#8217;t raise a dime to pay for anything so when the Democrats get the presidency they can&#8217;t afford to fix anything because of the insane debt and effed up economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doren</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Doren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>BS, Bush took the cost of the Iraq and Afghan wars off the books, Obama put them back on.  We will be recovering from GWBs stupidy for many years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BS, Bush took the cost of the Iraq and Afghan wars off the books, Obama put them back on.  We will be recovering from GWBs stupidy for many years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/11/27/the-new-republican-contract-on-america-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=8062#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>you can probably &quot;contest&quot; to the failing schools, because the word is attest, as in give testimony, not contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can probably &#8220;contest&#8221; to the failing schools, because the word is attest, as in give testimony, not contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

