<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huffington vs. Ailes: The Video Highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/02/01/10851/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/02/01/10851/</link>
	<description>News, Politics, And Opinion From Around The Globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uggs online</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/02/01/10851/comment-page-1/#comment-3715</link>
		<dc:creator>uggs online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=10851#comment-3715</guid>
		<description>What I only want to say is May all the victims rest in peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I only want to say is May all the victims rest in peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tammy cotton</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/02/01/10851/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>tammy cotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=10851#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>i correct myself by saying the rebuttal date was feb 3 10 instead of feb 2. and apologize for incorrect gramatics crediting beck&#039;s  argument to huffington&#039;s. i am a novice and significatly inexperienced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i correct myself by saying the rebuttal date was feb 3 10 instead of feb 2. and apologize for incorrect gramatics crediting beck&#8217;s  argument to huffington&#8217;s. i am a novice and significatly inexperienced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tammy cotton</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/02/01/10851/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>tammy cotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=10851#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>glenn beck delivered  what I submit is an effective rebuttal in what appears to me to be a precise and comprehensive examination of exactly what he said, how he said it, and what he meant when he applied the term slaughter (of the economy).  he explains transparently the context of his criticism by replaying his argument televised originally on nov 3 09.  huffinton&#039;s claim of him inciting the downtrodden by saying he accused the administration of wanting to slaughter (and she specified &quot;killing spree&quot;) is the sound reasoning behind the popularity of his arguments.  This rebuttal was televised on feb 2 10 on the glenn beck show.  for those who  seek a more honest portrayal rather than a hateful misleading one, huffington has been discredited. fox continues earn the attention of truth seekers.  I&#039;m obviously not as intellegent as the sophisticated progressive audience you seem to attract but i can add 1 + 1.  (unless it has some model of relative value i am unaware of.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glenn beck delivered  what I submit is an effective rebuttal in what appears to me to be a precise and comprehensive examination of exactly what he said, how he said it, and what he meant when he applied the term slaughter (of the economy).  he explains transparently the context of his criticism by replaying his argument televised originally on nov 3 09.  huffinton&#8217;s claim of him inciting the downtrodden by saying he accused the administration of wanting to slaughter (and she specified &#8220;killing spree&#8221;) is the sound reasoning behind the popularity of his arguments.  This rebuttal was televised on feb 2 10 on the glenn beck show.  for those who  seek a more honest portrayal rather than a hateful misleading one, huffington has been discredited. fox continues earn the attention of truth seekers.  I&#8217;m obviously not as intellegent as the sophisticated progressive audience you seem to attract but i can add 1 + 1.  (unless it has some model of relative value i am unaware of.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://newsjunkiepost.com/2010/02/01/10851/comment-page-1/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsjunkiepost.com/?p=10851#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by NewsJunkiePost: Huffington vs. Ailes: The Video Highlights http://goo.gl/fb/d661 #njp #videos #abc #ariannahuffington #barbarawalters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by NewsJunkiePost: Huffington vs. Ailes: The Video Highlights http://goo.gl/fb/d661 #njp #videos #abc #ariannahuffington #barbarawalters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

