Comments on: Climate Change: Not A Matter Of Faith

By: Jerry Matchett

Jerry Matchett — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:28:12 +0000

Calling names and suggesting ways to “deal” with those who disagree with you on a scientific matter is the most petty childish way of handling a disagreement. Science has traditionally looked at evidence. Sometimes the evidence is contradictory; sometimes it can be analyzed in different ways: often it is incomplete. But discussion of the scientific evidence is the only way to bring out the truth. Stop pretending that those who disagree with you have motives other than finding the truth and stop being so childish in your attitude.

By: Victor

Victor — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:32:38 +0000

I cant help feeling that climate denial is a crime against humanity. Especially those who spread misinformation for their own financial agenda.

By: B Diamond

B Diamond — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:03:57 +0000

Mike, it would be nice if you used a few facts to back up your faulty conclusions that are also unsubstantiated and rather poorly drawn.

PS. I have a brain. IQ over 155.

By: Ole Ole Olson

Ole Ole Olson — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:51:10 +0000

When have I ever equated the two? Give me one citation from my entire body of work, and I will apologize right here on the spot.

By: Ole Ole Olson

Ole Ole Olson — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:50:00 +0000

Which scientists exactly? Because there have been literally MILLIONS (note the capitalization for effect) of scientists that have contributed to the body of evidence that we have for anthropogenic climate change over the course of decades, and in 140 countries across the planet.

If you really want to look for corruption, how about investigating the link between big oil, conservative groups, and shady “studies” or websites designed to look professional, but only meant to actually confuse the public about what the science actually says.

Listen to the SCIENTISTS, not the spin doctors or corporate tools.

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:12:20 +0000

Why do you capitalize, “Denier?” Is it because you realize these so-called scientists aiming to prove Climate Change were corrupt and you need to demonize those that seek the truth? For shame, Mike Kaulbars.

By: Denier

Denier — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:11:32 +0000

“No matter how hard you are trying it is unlikely that any of you have a carbon footprint that is not at least 3 to 4 times what you have a right to, and in most cases it is likely to be much, much higher.”

See, we have a disagreement right there. Why do you get to decide what kind of carbon footprint I have a right to? And from what I understand, you base that footprint on how much damage/effect you think our carbon footprint has on the planet. I deny your being correct.

Ask yourself this, why do I want to destroy the planet? Why do I hate the world? There is no consensus on “man made” global warming. Your attitude is very condescending towards a whole group of people. Mike and Ole both want to associate “Deniers” with Christians as a way of deriding their point of view. Are you sure you guys aren’t part of Amway with your manipulation in order to further your own personal views?

By: === popurls.com === popular today

=== popurls.com === popular today — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:40:03 +0000

=== popurls.com === popular today…

yeah! this story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com…

By: Ole Ole Olson

Ole Ole Olson — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:01:17 +0000

what was it precisely in the IPCC report that made you change your mind?

By: Ole Ole Olson

Ole Ole Olson — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:59:07 +0000

Good call, and something that really highlights the anti-science similarities between those who deny natural evolution and those who deny man made climate change.