UN’s Violent Kleptocracy Prepares to Stay in Haiti

The so-called United Nations peacekeeping force is growing as surreptitiously as a cancer into a world transnational army. Since 1991 the force has expanded from 13,000 to more than 90,000, and into the highest-profile UN department, with an annual budget around $7 billion. The “Mission des Nations Unies pour la stabilisation en Haiti” (MINUSTAH) takes up about one tenth of the “peacekeeping” budget, despite Haiti being at peace.  Indeed, only the UN forces of the Congo and South Sudan exceed those of MINUSTAH. Since three months after the forcible removal of popularly elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide (on February 29, 2004) by a US-Canada-France force, MINUSTAH has occupied Haiti. It is currently the only UN occupation force in the Americas. There will no doubt be others.

The great majority of Haitians categorically reject MINUSTAH, and Haiti’s Senate passed a resolution in September 2011 that called for withdrawal of the troops by October 2012. Nevertheless, the groundwork was laid for the UN mandate to be renewed. With a $676.70 million budget at stake, the disregard for democracy was total. The UN Security Council announced its official decision to renew the force on October 14: on exactly the anniversary of the appearance of cholera in the country.

The introduction of the cholera into Haiti could not have been more efficient if it had been deliberate. Nearly 1,300 UN troops were immersed in a cholera epidemic in Kathmandu for three months in Summer 2010, ostensibly for training. Subsequently they were granted 10-day home leaves throughout Nepal before being returned to Haiti without medical exams. In Haiti, they settled into a camp near the pristine village of Meille, from which their fecal wastes were transported to an open septic pit. The human wastes spilled down a hill into a tributary to the country’s main Artibonite River and the irrigation canals from this river to most of the rice fields.

The first case of cholera followed the arrival of the troops by only five days. Workers in the rice paddies were decimated. Within a week, the infection spread through the entire country, possibly from the distribution of water collected from the river and sold as being purified. The cholera’s toll currently exceeds half a million contaminations and 7,500 deaths.

The popular outrage against this wholesale contamination and killing of Haitians has met with nothing but UN denials. As early as December 2010, Dr. Renaud Piarroux and his colleagues tried to publish the news on the Nepalese UN camp being the source of the contamination, but his publications were delayed until after Martelly’s election in May 2011. When the UN did respond to the charges, it was not to acknowledge fault and make amends, but to promote oral cholera vaccines. The first such vaccine they considered would have conferred no immunity at all. The one finally chosen, called Shanchol, had performed poorly in Indian field trials and contained dangerous levels of the mercury-based preservative thiomersal. Shanchol was developed with funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and manufactured by a troublesome subsidiary of the giant French pharmaceutical company Sanofi-Aventis.

The Pan American Health Organization and the World Health Organization (both agencies of the UN), together with UN Deputy Special Envoy Paul Farmer and his NGO Partners in Health have led the cholera vaccination campaign, which presupposes that the poor have no right to clean water and ought to develop immunity to fecal bacteria. Mr. Farmer sees no conflict in sitting on the board of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti (IJDH), an NGO that is getting nowhere with a lawsuit against the UN on behalf of Haiti’s cholera victims.

In December 2012 PAHO, WHO, PIH and others proposed a cholera-eradication plan that will require over $2 billion and 10 to 15 years. Such a plan would involve expensive and ineffective yearly vaccinations. This is all the more remarkable considering that Cuba just demonstrated that a cholera outbreak can be completely stopped in two months with provision of medical care, vigilant epidemiological surveillance, and clean water. But there is money in Haiti’s cholera, so why give up a good thing?

Although Brazil and Chile vowed in 2011 to withdraw their troops gradually from Haiti, the rate of this withdrawal has been quite slow, and it is made all the more imperceptible by a replacement of the Latin-American troops by Africans (e.g. Rwandans), Asians (e.g. Bangdaleshi and Sri Lankan) and Canadians. Despite Rafael Correa’s talk of Bolivar and Petion, Ecuador is not reducing its military presence in Haiti at all but has instead joined Brazil’s colonization project. Soon after a visit by Martelly in July 2012, Ecuador replaced all its Haiti troops with fresh ones; in addition it accepted a group of eight Haitian cadets into its military academy. As if this were not enough, the UN is also hiring unknown numbers of troops from private military and security companies (PMSC) on the quiet for its “peacekeeping” missions.

Every year, the preparation of public opinion for MINUSTAH’s renewal is usually long and systematic. A mysterious rash of violent homicides in early spring typically precedes the proposal of a new budget in May or June. News of its adoption and every subsequent stage of the renewal are released to the public as official statements, along with suggestions that the renewal is imminent.

For the year 2012, for example, on October 4 the Guatemalan Ambassador to the UN told the press that he expected a resolution to be approved to renew the UN mission in Haiti another year. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, for his part, noted that the number of troops and military engineers would be reduced from 7,340 to 6,270 by June 2013: a decline of merely 14 percent. Meanwhile, Michel Martelly, who was installed by the UN as Haiti’s president in an election that excluded the majority party Fanmi Lavalas (Aristide’s former party) invited the UN to transform its mandate in the country into a nation-building experiment.

Conclusion of the military occupation, the UN calculates, will require replacement of the MINUSTAH troops with a local “police” force of 16,000. This massive force is presumably needed in the country with the lowest crime rate in the Caribbean and the only UN-occupied country that is not at war. In June 2012, Minister of the Interior Thierry Mayard-Paul announced the inauguration of a 2,500-man Agency of National Security. The one-letter difference between Mayard-Paul’s group (ASN) and Duvalier’s Volunteers for National Security (VSN), better known as the tontons macoutes, was not lost on anyone.

On Friday October 12, 2012, Haitian Senator Moise Jean-Charles accompanied a delegation of Haitian politicians and labor leaders, together with Latin-American diplomats to the UN to deliver a formal objection to the renewal of MINUSTAH’s mandate. The delegation and protesters called for MINUSTAH to remunerate the cholera victims and acknowledge that its troops introduced the epidemic into the country. In addition, they demanded that UN personnel be stripped of their immunity from prosecution so that the murderers and rapists in their ranks can be prosecuted by Haiti for the harm done to its nationals. Year after year, the UN Security Council ignores such highly reasonable objections to MINUSTAH’s continued stay in Haiti, but it cannot pretend they were never voiced.

UPDATE #1. October 29, 2012, Bernama. One hundred and sixty-seven Indonesian “peacekeeping” troops (144 from the army, 21 from the navy and 2 from the air force) arrive in the city of Gonaives on Monday, October 29.

UPDATE #2. December 12, 2012, Radio Canada. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has formally announced the $2.27 billion plan to “eliminate cholera from Haiti and the Dominican Republic”, with Paul Farmer being named as the “Special Counsel to the Secretary General on this initiative.” According to the Secretary General’s statement, 70 percent of the funds will go to the development of “sanitary infrastructure,” and the rest to the vaccination of people in “high-risk areas,” such as populous urban neighborhoods and “isolated rural areas.” Interestingly, the presence or absence of cholera was not mentioned as a criterion. It seems more urgent to vaccinate the poor: especially the rebellious poor.

UPDATE #3. December 20, 2012, Ottawa Citizen. As Brazil reduces its force to pre-earthquake levels, Canada’s National Defense considers “embedding a Canadian platoon of soldiers in an existing Brazilian unit, as well as deploying additional Canadian troops to help with headquarters and logistics.” The initial plan calls for a force of about 50, but this would be a long-term multi-year commitment that calls for six-month rotations.

UPDATE #4. April 11, 2013, RadioVision 2000 and AP. A group of 460 Brazilian UN troops will leave Haiti in June 2013; however, 750 Sri Lankan troops have arrived (350 on March 28, and 400 on April 1). Meanwhile, Virginia-based US military contractor DynCorp received a $48.6 million contract from the US State Department’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. The contract, which specifies a one-year base period with three one-year options, is for the insertion of 100 mercenaries and 10 advisers into the “UN police” force in Haiti. On the announcement of this contract, DynCorp boasted of having already trained over 400 “Haitian police” (paramilitaries).

UPDATE #5. September 30, 2014, UN Press Release. At a meeting of the UN General Assembly about MINUSTAH’s budget on May 7, 2014, when the Secretary General proposed a reduction from $575.89 million to $511.31 million (11.2 percent), it was opposed by ?CostaRica?, ??Brazil?, ??Guatemala?, and Haiti’s government. Costa Rica argued that MINUSTAH “must have the requisite resources to help Haitian authorities bolster security, institute democratic governance and the rule of law, and combat cholera.” Brazil proposed that the “Mission” should be phased out but that the funds should be used to replace it with “MINUSTAH law enforcement support in remote areas.” Guatemala said that MINUSTAH would need the funds for its “essential role in helping Haiti hold legislative and local elections expected later this year” (which have not happened), and Haiti’s representatives complained that the government was in financial trouble and that the Mission needs “a well-balanced budget to fight cholera, among other challenges.” As I noted before in connection with the UN, it’s your friends that you should watch more than your enemies.

Editor’s Notes: This article is also available in Portuguese.  Image 1 is by Ramon Espinosa/AP; it shows UN special envoy to Haiti and former US president Bill Clinton (center) embracing Deputy UN special envoy Paul Farmer (left) at the celebration of a new free-trade zone for Port-au-Prince, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009. Images 3, 4, and 8 are by Thony Belizaire/AFP/Getty Image 5 is by El Comercio, Ecuador. Image 2 of President Lula’s review of Brazilian troops in Haiti, and images 6 and 7 of Clinton and the Martellys with Jean-Claude Duvalier are by unidentified photographers.

Dady Chery is a journalist, playwright, essayist and poet, who writes in English, French and her native Creole. She is the Co-Editor in Chief of News Junkie Post and the Editor of Haiti Chery.

 

email
Share

4 Responses to UN’s Violent Kleptocracy Prepares to Stay in Haiti

  1. +3 Vote -1 Vote +1Max J
    October 25, 2012 at 9:47 am

    This occupation, coming in the year of the bi-centennial of Haiti’s independence, epitomizes the naked arrogance of the self-proclaimed great powers. We, Haitians, must not lose sight of the fact that it was meant to nullify the accomplishments of our ancestors. Sadly, it was aided and abetted by a small group of Haitians that considers itself the legitimate representative of the people. Make no mistakes, its legacy will be undone as soon as the country recovers its sovereignty.

  2. -3 Vote -1 Vote +1Kathy
    October 26, 2012 at 6:56 am

    Comparing Cuba’s experience with cholera to that in Haiti is like comparing apples and oranges. While the proposed $2 billion has not been allocated, the proposed budget includes improvements to safe water and sanitation systems in addition to funding for the vaccine which has proven to slow the spread of this deadly disease. In a setting where poor (and often no) sanitation is the reality and not likely to change without large-scale intervention, all methods of treatment and prevention should be utilized to save lives. I’m sure everyone would agree that one death from cholera is too many.

  3. +4 Vote -1 Vote +1Dady Chery
    October 26, 2012 at 4:18 pm

    Cuba’s experience with cholera is exactly what should be compared to Haiti’s. During the dry season in Haiti, there were only a few foci left of the cholera. With epidemiological surveillance and provision of care and clean drinking water, the cholera could have been completely gone by now. Nothing was done.

    Instead, during the rainy season, cholera vaccines were administered to St. Marc: an area from which the cholera had disappeared. An Indian field trial showed that the Shanchol oral cholera vaccine was useless. At best, only 45% of those vaccinated were protected after one year; for children under five, the vaccine offered essentially no protection, with only 17% of those vaccinated found to be protected after one year.

    More recent reports on Shanchol showed no difference between people who were vaccinated compared to those were not. Instead of concluding that the vaccine should be thrown out, the researchers argued that the vaccine must have indirectly protected people who had not been vaccinated (and they no doubt went home to have a good laugh).

    As for the provision of clean drinking water. Municipal water systems are being sabotaged throughout the country to create an incentive for reconstruction contracts. Haiti does not need water charity. It needs to be rid of this kleptocracy.

    If “one death from cholera is too many,” then over 7,500 deaths and a plan for 10-15 years of more death is criminal. Your $2 billion can only mean more death and parasitic NGO. This is all that aid money has ever meant for Haitians.

  4. +1 Vote -1 Vote +1Sabe
    November 4, 2012 at 10:12 am

    I suggest the reading of “u.n. a cosa nostra” to understand how these operations to rescue human lives are conducted by certain un organisations!