United Nations: The Perversion of a Good Intention

295582_10151456074256003_2000464583_n

Once upon a time, the United Nations was held up as a beacon of moral authority and hope for world peace. That was long before the UN formally became a criminal organization. The Dutch Supreme Court ruled on September 6, 2013, in the Hasan Nuhanovic case, that UN personnel called “Dutchbat”, under the authority of the Dutch State, have violated the rights of three Bosnian Muslims to life and protection from inhuman treatment and must make reparations for this crime.

4401592156_b9e07e742a_z

The UN has fallen quite short of the original vision of Eleanor Roosevelt and others to create a forum in which disputes between countries might be peacefully resolved. Back when the UN was founded, the West was gasping from the mass slaughter of Europeans in two World Wars; furthermore, while the colonial powers were preoccupied with each other, much of the world had seized the opportunity to gain independence. This should never happen again, everyone agreed, but instead of a body that enforces international law equally for all nations, we got the Security Council: an elite group with veto power made up of those countries that had committed the most violations against the principles of the UN Charter.

1236650_10200535003285361_175782645_n

One could say that the UN has succeeded in its mission, if this is defined as being a project to focus the world powers’ aggression on weaker countries, rather than directly engaging each other in costly wars. In effect, the UN functions as an alliance of criminals who have made peace with each other so as to reduce the bloodshed among themselves. The Security Council enforces the UN Charter only when an invasion is inconvenient for one or more of its members. For example, the UN has defended Kuwait from invasion by Iraq but not Panama from invasion by the US. Victims, including Somalia, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Libya, and more recently, Mali, Syria and Iran, are softened up for invasions by UN Resolutions for oil embargoes, no-fly zones, and the like. After the invasions, the victims are held subjugated by a “peacekeeping force.” This corrupt and corrupting branch of the UN, entirely at the service of imperialism, is also its fastest-growing.

4301085483_44550ea95b_z

Over the last 20 years or so of UN “peacekeeping,” the crimes of UN soldiers have included gunrunning, trading food for sex, cholera contamination, human trafficking, child prostitution, rape, and murders of all sorts. What makes UN “peacekeeping” so attractive to psychopaths is that it gives them complete license to commit the most egregious crimes. The worst the UN ever does is return them to their home countries, which do not prosecute them because of UN immunity. Indeed, when these soldiers are repatriated, they are usually reincorporated into their country’s armed forces.

4177387200_62f0eaf06d_z

The Nuhanovic case represents the first instance of UN personnel being found guilty of a crime in a civil court. The reason it took this case to make a chink in the armor of UN immunity is because the involvement of the Dutch State was incontrovertible, and contrary to the status of many other countries that contribute “peacekeeping forces” to the UN, in Holland there is still the rule of law. Furthermore, the criminal behavior in this instance was as blatant as it was horrific.

United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR)

The heart of the Nuhanovic case was whether the Dutch State could be held responsible for the crimes of its nationals while they served as UN personnel. Indeed, on the first pass, a Hague District Court ruled on September 10, 2008 that Dutchbat’s conduct was exclusively the responsibility of the UN. Subsequently the Hague Court of Appeal reasoned, in rulings on July 5, 2011 and June 26, 2012 that responsibility of the Dutch State did not exclude responsibility of the UN. The Dutch Supreme Court upheld this ruling one year later. In all, it took 18 years for justice to be served.

5763104078_a5e81587cf_z

The plaintiff, Hasan Nuhanovic, was an interpreter for the UN Military Observers in Srebrenica, whose father, mother, and younger brother were put out of a safe UN compound in summer 1995 to be taken away and murdered by the Bosnian-Serb army or related paramilitary groups. One day before Nuhanovic’s family was put out to slaughter, the Dutch Defense Minister directly ordered the Dutchbat commander to “save whatever can be saved.” The Dutchbat commander then made a deal with Ratko Mladic, better known as the “butcher of Bosnia,” to evacuate 29 local UN personnel together with Dutchbat; in return, 32,000 Bosnian Muslim refugees, who had sought safety inside and just outside of the UN compound, would be abandoned to the genocidal Bosnian Serb army. That fateful meeting was attended by none other than Mr. Nuhanovic’s father, Ibro. Thus Hassan Nuhanovic had every reason to fear for his family. He pleaded with the UN to include in the list of local UN personnel his family, and especially his younger brother, a minor who would certainly be killed by the Bosnian Serb army for being a Muslim male of military age.

8748882373_9b4b7a4b79_o

For two days, Bosnian Muslim women and children were separated from the men, and with the acquiescence of the UN, removed around the clock by the busloads. Many of the men were tortured and divested of their personal possessions and identity papers at a place called the “White House,” less than a quarter mile from the UN compound. Most of the men of military age, estimated to have numbered about 7,000, were murdered in mass executions. Though it is not possible to check the veracity of some reports which claim that the UN actually assisted in the roundup of the men, it is clear that the torture and even some of the killing occurred within earshot of the UN. It is in this context that Dutchbat ordered Nuhanovic’s father Ibro, his mother Nasiha, and his brother Muhamed to leave the UN compound on the evening of July 13, 1995. In a final twist of pure evil, at the last minute Dutchbat offered protection to Ibro but not to his wife and teenage son. He refused and went to his death together with them. These are the circumstances that led the Supreme Court to uphold the ruling that the Dutch State was responsible for the deaths of Ibro and Muhamed Nuhanovic.

3854942525_6e9fa67036_z

It is notable that the court did not hold the state responsible for the death of Nuhanovic’s mother Nasiha. This was presumably because the Bosnian Muslim women were not considered to be at risk of being killed — although tales of rapes by the Serb army were rampant. Therefore, even with the Nuhanovic case as a precedent, subsequent court cases against the UN will not be easy: not even those about the failure of the UN to provide safety to Bosnian Muslim refugees. The thousands of Bosnian Muslims who still await justice, for example, will have to prove that their loved ones were not the first to be killed, but among those who were slaughtered after the UN became aware of the genocide. All other cases, at the least, will require proof that a state also had effective control of the UN troops during a crime.

4296161566_893f5d7d64_z

Regrettably, the UN is still not directly liable for its many crimes. Still, the ruling in the Nuhanovic case, that a state is responsible for its participation in UN crimes, offers the promise of at least some deterrence to criminals who seek to practice their atrocities under UN protection. Promising targets for such deterrence include the Brazilian and Argentinian “peacekeepers” who massacred Aristide supporters in Haiti, with the full knowledge of their governments.

Editor’s Note: Photographs one, two, three, four, five, six and ten by United Nations. Photograph seven Surian Soosay.

 

email
Share

5 Responses to United Nations: The Perversion of a Good Intention

  1. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1Harry Comeau
    September 14, 2013 at 5:39 pm

    My only objection to this well documented article is the text’s title, because I strongly doubt any good intention on the UN’s part. In the case of Haiti, there was an after the fact decision by the Security Council, for there were no warring factions in Haiti. As a founding member of the UN, Haiti is still being mistreated by a world organization that brought thousands of deaths through the murderous cholera. This frenetic adventure is approaching its first decade with no end in sight. Keep shedding the light Dady, we need it.

    • Dady Chery
      +3 Vote -1 Vote +1Dady Chery
      September 16, 2013 at 5:27 pm

      Thank you reading the article, Harry. Will do.

      Indeed, the UNSC has ignored its own laws by invading Haiti, a country that was not at war. As for the cholera: Haiti is probably not the first country that the UN has contaminated, nor will it be the last. The UN did not come to Haiti to keep the peace but to guard the country’s gold for US and Canadian mining companies and crush any resource nationalism, together with Aristide.

  2. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1john goss
    September 15, 2013 at 1:41 am

    The UN does not exert the power it is supposed to have. If it did, places like Guantanamo Bay Detention Center would not exist. The UN Security Council permanent members turn a blind eye to the very crimes the international organization was set up to prevent.

    • Dady Chery
      +4 Vote -1 Vote +1Dady Chery
      September 16, 2013 at 5:30 pm

      Gitmo is a disgrace, an insult to everything that is human and decent, but the UN cannot say much about it because its mouth is too full (with US dollars).

  3. +1 Vote -1 Vote +1ERITREAN
    October 15, 2013 at 8:09 pm

    Excellent Article… Finally, someone has the guts to tell it like it is, exposes the UN criminal empire (Global-Mafia) serving Western-slaver empires agenda and interest, waging wars all over the world to control, manipulate, conquerand loot global world resources and treasures, disguised in “devinne UN mission.”

    Thank you for standing up and speaking for billions of people all over the world who are silenced by UN tanks.

    The UN was forged and financed by the winners of WWII to advance, protect and preserve their political interest and global economic advantage. Therefore, just like neighborhood gangs and mafias protect their territories and interests with blood, so do those who forged and financed the UN.

    See the information below about Eritrea:

    Mercenary Western Slave-Empires, Trading Eritrean Blood for Oil: The Greatest Truth Never Told?

    September 27, 1945

    The honorable James F. Byrnes
    Secretary of state
    Washington D.C.

    Dear Mr. Secretary,

    My company has only recently completed an agreement with the Imperial Ethiopian government for the development of petroleum in Ethiopia.

    I feel rather certain that you, personally, have been informed with request to this agreement. Unfortunately, the country of Ethiopia is an inland country, with no direct water outlet for export shipping. Should we be successful in discovering oil, we would, of necessity, be required to construct adequate pipe line facilities from Ethiopia to a suitable seaport, as well as an export shipping terminal.

    If we are to proceed with our development program in Ethiopia, it is of vital importance that Eritrea should be recognized as an integral part of Ethiopia, as we would have a suitable seaport outlet.

    Our entire development program will seriously be delayed and affected should Eritrea be under the domination of any other power except Ethiopia. I, therefore, urgently request that your good offices support the demand of Ethiopia with respect to Eritrea.

    For your personal information, I am attaching hereto photo static copy of the supplemental agreement between my company and the Imperial Ethiopian Government, with respect to construction of pipe lines in outboard outlets, from which you will readily see the importance to this project of the acquisition of Eritrea by Ethiopia.

    Very truly yours

    Signed: President

    SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
    630 FIFTH AVENUE
    NEW YORK, N.Y.

    “From the point of view of justice, the opinions of the Eritrean people must receive consideration. Nevertheless, the strategic interests of the US in the Red Sea Basin and considerations of security and world peace make it necessary that Eritrea be linked with our ally, Ethiopia”.

    John F. Dulles
    US State Secretary

    In Dec. 2,1950, Res. 390, the UN voted 46 to 10 to federate Eritrea with Ethiopia, against Eritreans’ demand for independence.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login